Etiological factors and evolution of neonatal sepsis at Heal Africa hospital from January 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Sepsis is the presence of a severe infectious condition associated with persistent arterial hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation. It constitutes a major public health problem at international, continental, national, and local levels. This study evaluates the etiological and evolutionary factors of neonatal sepsis at Heal Africa Hospital.
Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study with a descriptive and analytical approach. The sampling method was exhaustive, involving 152 newborns at Heal Africa from January 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. Data were collected using SPSS version 24 for encoding and descriptive tables, with data entry performed using Microsoft Word and Excel 2016.
Results: A total of 152 cases of neonatal sepsis were observed. Male newborns were the most affected, accounting for 56.6%. The majority of mothers were aged between 20 and 35 years (49.3%). Of the mothers of newborns with neonatal sepsis, 49.3% were housewives, while 46.1% came from the Goma Health Zone. Secondary education was the highest level attained by 37.5% of the affected mothers, and 37.5% of the mothers were multiparous. Additionally, 37.5% of the mothers had malaria during pregnancy, while 52.0% developed urogenital infections. Neonatal sepsis developed between the 1st and 5th day of birth in 59.2% of cases. Vaginal delivery was the most common mode of birth (70.4%). Premature birth was observed in 38.2% of cases, and 53.3% of newborns required resuscitation at birth. Staphylococcus epidermidis accounted for 38.5% of the detected germs, showing sensitivity to Methicillin, Vancomycin, Ciprofloxacin, and Augmentin while exhibiting resistance to Tetracycline, Penicillin, and Erythromycin. Haemophilus influenzae was identified in 33.4% of deceased newborns, followed by E. Coli at 26.7% statistically significant, with p-values of 0.02 and 0.04 respectively.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. Les troisièmes définitions consensuelles internationales pour le sepsis et le choc septique (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2020;315(8):801 10.
Numbi O. Détresse circulatoire et choc septique néonatal. Rev Pédiatr Fleuve Congo. 2020;1:1 6.
Division Provinciale de la Santé. Rapport annuel des pathologies néonatales. Goma (RDC); 2022.
Langhendries JP. Antibiotiques en néonatologie: pour un usage plus rationnel. In: Masson E, éditeur. Néonatologie: bases scientifiques. Paris: Saliba Elie; 2017. p. 69 85.
McIntyre L. Enquête sur les pratiques de réanimation de l’intensiviste canadien au début du choc septique. Med Soins Intensifs. 2007;1:1 9.
Polin RA; Comité sur le fœtus et le nouveau-né. Prise en charge des nouveau-nés présentant une septicémie bactérienne précoce suspectée ou avérée. Pediatrics. 2012;129(5):1006 15. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-0541.
Brady MT, Polin RA. Prévention et prise en charge des nourrissons atteints de sepsis néonatal suspecté ou avéré. Pediatrics. 2013;132(1):166 8. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1310.
Puopolo KM, Lynfield R, Cummings JJ, et al. Prise en charge des nourrissons à risque de maladie streptococcique du groupe B. Pediatrics. 2019;144(2):e20191881. doi:10.1542/peds.2019-1881.
Jefferies AL. Prise en charge des nourrissons nés à terme présentant un risque accru de sepsie bactérienne précoce. Paediatr Child Health. 2020;22(4):223 8.
Benitz WE, Han MY, Madan A, Ramachandra P. Séries de taux sériques de protéine C réactive dans le diagnostic de l’infection néonatale. Pediatrics. 2018;102(4):E41.
Gilfillan M, Bhandari V. Biomarqueurs pour le diagnostic de la septicémie néonatale. Pediatrics. 2017;105(1):25 33.
Shane AL, Sánchez PJ, Stoll BJ. Neonatal sepsis. Lancet. 2017;390(10104):1770 80. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31002-4.
Bech CM, Stensgaard CN, Lund S, et al. Risk factors for neonatal sepsis in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2022;12(9):e054491.
Manuel MSD – Édition professionnelle. Sepsis néonatal. 2025.
Murthy S, Godinho MA, Guddattu V, Lewis LES, Nair NS. Risk factors of neonatal sepsis in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215683. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215683.
Murthy S, Godinho MA, Guddattu V, Lewis LES, Nair NS. Risk factors of neonatal sepsis in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2009;14(4):e0215683. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.021568.