Feasibility and Diagnostic Yield of Blind Transrectal Digital Core Biopsy for Prostate Cancer in a Resource Limited Setting: A Cross Sectional Study Faisabilité et rendement diagnostique de la biopsie prostatique transrectale digitale à l’aveugle en milieu à ressources limitées : étude transversale
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
Introduction: Prostate cancer imposes a significant burden in resource-limited settings where advanced imaging like transrectal ultrasound or MRI is unavailable, necessitating evaluation of simpler biopsy techniques. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, diagnostic yield, safety profile, and prognostic utility of serum PSA in blind transrectal digital-guided core prostate biopsy performed at a low resource setting. The primary research question was whether this technique provides clinically meaningful histopathological confirmation and risk stratification in high-prevalence, late-presentation populations.
Matérial and methods
This prospective cross‑sectional study included 46 consecutive men (mean age 71 years) who underwent blind digital transrectal core biopsy at HEAL Africa Hospital (April 2023–September 2025). Histopathology categorized specimens as benign or malignant. Continuous variables were summarized as mean ± standard deviation, categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Because PSA values were non‑normally distributed, non‑parametric analyses were applied, including Spearman’s correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess PSA discrimination (AUC, optimal cutoff via Youden index). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results: Adenocarcinoma was confirmed in 69.6% (32/46), with high-grade tumors (Gleason ≥8) in 46.8%. PSA strongly associated with cancer diagnosis (rₛ =0.782, p<0.001) and Gleason score (rₛ =0.423, p=0.016). ROC analysis yielded AUC 0.953 (95% CI 0.895-1.000), optimal cutoff 49.8 ng/mL (sensitivity 75%, specificity 100%). Complications were low (6.5%, mild hematuria/rectal bleeding); repeat biopsy was needed in 4.3%.
Conclusion: Blind digital transrectal prostate biopsy demonstrates feasibility and safety in resource‑limited environments. When combined with prostate‑specific antigen (PSA) testing, this approach provides robust diagnostic and prognostic utility. These findings highlight a pragmatic pathway toward equitable access to prostate cancer diagnosis in settings where imaging modalities are unavailable
Details de l'article

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
Références
Lin X, Zhi Y. Global epidemiological trends in prostate cancer burden : a comprehensive analysis from Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Transl Androl Urol [Internet]. 2025;14(5):1238–52.
Christina K, Silva S. The global , regional , and national prostate cancer burden and trends from 1990 to 2021 , results from the global burden of disease study 2021. Front Public Heal. 2025;13:1–17.
Goel R, Suryavanshi M. Prostate Biopsy : Is it Still Relevant Today ? J Med Evid. 2025;6(2):158–163.
Kania E, Janica M, Nesterowicz M, Modzelewski W, Cybulski M. Advances and Challenges in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis : A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel). 2025;17(13):1–28.
Anu RI, Shamsudeen S, Leslie SW. Prostate Cancer Tissue-Based Biomarkers [Internet]. NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2025. 1–11 p.
Osama S, Serboiu C, Taciuc IA, Angelescu E, Petcu C, Priporeanu TA, et al. Current Approach to Complications and Difficulties during Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsies. J Clin Med. 2024;13(2).
Bulai CA, Stoica RA, Militaru A, Maria A, Punga A, Vaduva RI, et al. Optimizing Prostate Biopsy Pathways : Integrating MRI – Targeted , Systematic Sampling , and Clinical Judgment in the PSA-Era. diagnostics. 2026;16(3):1–16.
Derboise M, Biyouma C, Gebreselassie KH, Makon N, Tadesse A, Ste A, et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis and management : current practices in Africa a consultant-based survey. Front Urol [Internet]. 2025;5(March):1–13.
Hussain HK, Rajeev R, DeStigter KK, Gulani V. Global Cancer Imaging Access : Addressing Barriers and Harnessing Innovations. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025;7(6):1–12.
Hodge KK, Mcneal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random Systematic Versus Directed Ultrasound‑Guided Transrectal Core Biopsies of the Prostate. J Urol [Internet]. 1989;142(1):71–4.
Mekeme JBM, Mbouche OL, Bello F, Awondo BC, Mbassi AA, Fouda CJ, et al. Comparison of Transrectal Prostate Digital and Ultrasound-Guided Core Biopsies in 400 Men in a Low-and-Middle Income Country. Open J Urol. 2023;13(10):418–32.
Shu CP, Tchinde MJ, Georter T, Sop J, Ndonku SA, Juma PI. Correlation between total prostate specific antigen and histological grading of prostate cancer in Kenyan mission hospital : a five-year retrospective review. BMC Urol. 2025;25:1–6.
Ngowi BN, Mremi A, Seif MJ, Kyara YS, Mteta VK, Bright F, et al. Prostate Cancer : Burden and Correlation with Prostate Specific Antigen Among Screened African Men in Tanzania. Res Reports Urol. 2024;16:315–25.
David MK, Leslie SW. Prostate-Specific Antigen. NCBI Bookshelf A Serv Natl Libr Med Natl Institutes Heal StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Isl StatPearls Publ 2025 Jan- [Internet]. 2025;
Streicher J, Meyerson BL, Karivedu V, Sidana A. A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques. Ther Adv Urol. 2019;11:1–8.
Leenders GJLH Van, Kwast TH Van Der, Grignon DJ, Evans AJ, Kristiansen G, Kweldam CF, et al. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology ( ISUP ) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44(8):87–99.
Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA, et al. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology ( ISUP ) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol [Internet]. 2015;00(00):1–9. Available
Descotes JL. Diagnosis of prostate cancer. Asian J Urol [Internet]. 2019;6(2):129–36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.11.007
Gravestock P, Shaw M, Veeratterapillay R, Heer R. Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Biopsy Approaches. Urol Cancers. 2022;(24):141–68.
WHO Africa. Understanding Africa ’ s prostate cancer prevalence , risks and prevention mechanisms [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2026 Feb 19]. p. 1–6.
Najjar S, Mirvald C, Danilov A, Labanaris A, Vlaicu AG, Giurca L, et al. Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and Complication Rate of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Prostate Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. Cancers (Basel). 2025;17(6):1–15.
James ND, Tannock I, Dow JN, Feng F, Gillessen S, Ali SA, et al. The Lancet Commissions The Lancet Commission on prostate cancer : planning for the surge in cases. Lancet [Internet]. 2024;403(10437):1683–722.
Hu Z, Zeng D, Zhao X, Luo Y, Li Z, You W, et al. Global Disparities and Temporal Trends in Prostate , Bladder , and Kidney Cancer Burden Among Men : A Systematic Analysis of 204 Countries ( 1990-2021 ). Cancer Control [Internet]. 2025;32(83):1–18.
Puri D, Pandit K, Choi N, Rose BS, Mckay RR, Bagrodia A. Striving for Equity : Examining Health Disparities in Urologic Oncology. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(21):1–14.
Adria J, Kadeer A, Maolake A, Aimaier A. Diagnostic accuracy of PSA derivatives for prostate cancer in patients with low prostate-speci fi c antigen levels. Front Oncol. 2025;15:1–5.
Musungu V, Marera D, Oyieko W, Makunda WN, Siwa B. Using Prostate-specific Antigen to Predict Gleason Scores in African Men Seeking Urological Services at a Referral Hospital in Kisumu , Kenya. J Adv Med Med Res. 2024;36(8):1–7.
Antoine CM, Morrison BF, Brooks ME. Complications of Prostate Biopsy : A Prospective , Single-institution Study. J Adv Med Med Res. 2020;32(24):271–9.
Brassil M, Li Y, Ordon M, Colak E, Vlachou P. Infection complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy : A radiology department ’ s experience and strategy for improvement. Can Urol ASSOC. 2022;16(11):1–5.
Telukdarie A, Makoni L, Sarma RR, Munsamy M, Kumar S. System Models for Synchronous Strategies in Operational Healthcare Forecasting. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025;22(2):1–28.
Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, et al. Global Surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569–624.
World Health Organization. Guide to cancer early diagnosis [Internet]. 2017. 48 p.